When two neighbouring council clients of PSTAX jointly purchased a building for public use, they encountered a complex VAT issue that threatened to create unnecessary administrative burdens and costs. As joint owners, both councils were initially required to account for VAT as a new partnership with a new VAT registration. This is despite there being no loss to HMRC if all the VAT were accounted for through one of the councils’ existing VAT registrations. This additional HMRC-demanded administration would not only create inefficiencies but also place an avoidable strain on public funds.

The VAT Challenge

HMRC insisted that both councils must follow its public notice and policy, even though this position was not legally mandated but rather an administrative position. PSTAX recognised that this approach contradicted the principles of efficiency and fairness – one council could efficiently pay the correct additional VAT, making a new VAT registration redundant.

Furthermore, the issue extended beyond the two councils. If left unchallenged, HMRC’s stance could have set a precedent, affecting local authorities across the country and increasing the administrative burden on councils at a time when public sector efficiency is more crucial than ever.

Our Approach

Rather than accept HMRC’s rigid position, PSTAX VAT specialists engaged directly with them to advocate for a common-sense resolution. Our argument was straightforward: the councils were not seeking to circumvent VAT rules but rather to avoid unnecessary duplication. We presented a clear case that there would be no VAT loss, and requiring the councils to set up a new joint VAT registration to account for VAT was an inefficient application of policy.

We challenged HMRC’s reliance on an administrative notice that was not backed by law, urging them to consider the real-world effect on local government operations. Our goal was not to rewrite policy but to ensure its application was practical and fair.

The Outcome

Through persistent engagement and well-reasoned advocacy from Managing Partner, Nick Burrows, Associate Director, Richard Strevens and Tax Barrister, Leslie Allen, we successfully demonstrated that HMRC’s stance was unnecessary and counterproductive. As a result, HMRC is reviewing its position.

Impact and Broader Implications for Local Authorities 

This step forward might not only benefit the two councils but also set an important example for other local authorities. By preventing unnecessary administrative duplication, we could help streamline operations, allowing councils to focus on delivering services rather than managing avoidable tax complications.

This case underscores the importance of challenging policy applications that create inefficiencies without legal justification. Our work in this matter reflects a commitment to advocating for fair, practical tax solutions that support effective public sector management.

Conclusion

By championing a logical and legally sound resolution, we might achieve a result that benefits both local authorities and the public purse. This case highlights the value of questioning rigid policy applications and ensuring that tax regulations serve their intended purpose – without creating unnecessary administrative burdens.

At a time when public sector efficiency is paramount, this case demonstrates the real-world effect of applying tax expertise to deliver smarter, more effective solutions.

Simplify Your VAT Challenges with PSTAX

VAT complexities shouldn’t create unnecessary costs or administrative burdens. At PSTAX, we provide practical, common-sense solutions that ensure compliance while protecting public funds.

If your organisation is facing VAT challenges, our experts are here to help you find a more efficient way forward. Get in touch today to see how we can support you with fair and effective tax solutions.

Get in touch